Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 49

Thread: Behringer DCX2496 Ultradrive Pro

  1. #21
    Senior Hostboard Member Panomaniac's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 25th, 2006
    Posts
    1,811
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    1 Post(s)

    Re: Behringer DCX2496 Ultradrive Pro

    There is a lot of talk about how to wire the DCX for unbalanced. Tie 3 to ground, leave 3 open, tie 3 to ground via 10K, 20K, 50K and others. I've tried them all.
    What actually worked by far the best for me was a transformer on the XLR output. But of course that was the biggest, heaviest and must expensive option.

    Your balanced resistor attenuator should work well. Let us know!

  2. #22
    Senior Hostboard Member mah's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 28th, 2008
    Posts
    2,003
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    1 Post(s)

    Re: Behringer DCX2496 Ultradrive Pro

    Opinion is only as valid as its verifiable supporting evidence.

  3. #23
    Senior Hostboard Member bowtie427ss's Avatar
    Join Date
    July 24th, 2006
    Location
    Rural NY
    Posts
    3,901
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    26 Post(s)

    Re: Behringer DCX2496 Ultradrive Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by mah View Post
    Not if freq response/bandwidth is a concern. The posted specs are BS, many folks have measured the clean box and it has no business in a "hifi" system.

    Just my .02......................... i'm sure someone here will think it's wonderful.
    Not all vegetables make good leaders.

  4. #24
    Senior Hostboard Member mah's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 28th, 2008
    Posts
    2,003
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    1 Post(s)

    Re: Behringer DCX2496 Ultradrive Pro

    Is there something that does the conversions but of suitable performance?
    Opinion is only as valid as its verifiable supporting evidence.

  5. #25
    Senior Hostboard Member Panomaniac's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 25th, 2006
    Posts
    1,811
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    1 Post(s)

    Re: Behringer DCX2496 Ultradrive Pro

    Good question. The attenuation isn't a big deal, but the level shift up for the input is nice. It's what a preamp should do anyway.

    Are you sure your preamps don't have enough gain and headroom to run a strong signal into the DCX? Can you measure? Or look at the input meters on the DCX? If you need a reference level tone, we can get you one.

  6. #26
    Senior Hostboard Member mah's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 28th, 2008
    Posts
    2,003
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    1 Post(s)

    Re: Behringer DCX2496 Ultradrive Pro

    I have found some relevant material on the net which I will post tomorrow for comment.

    My amps, Sony 1120(made 1965-1968) and Sony Vfet Ta-4650(1974-1978), were both Hi-End, low-noise models in their day- definitely pre CD, definitely 1V out/in @ pre/main.
    As I said, previously, I am a bit of a Luddite. Used Classic gear at budget prices also suits my level of disposable income. Buying a dcx3400 would be a big deal for me, so I want to get it right.

    Until the morrow, Marshall.
    Opinion is only as valid as its verifiable supporting evidence.

  7. #27
    Senior Hostboard Member Steve Mac's Avatar
    Join Date
    January 5th, 2006
    Posts
    732
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    18 Post(s)

    Re: Behringer DCX2496 Ultradrive Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by mah View Post
    Is there something that does the conversions but of suitable performance?
    Honestly, you don't want anything active between the XO and power amps.
    It is extremely cheap to wire in your own resistors in an attenuator and wrap it up like the Endler attenuators do. You can use some cheap slider pots until you get the appropriate levels and then pull the pots and install fixed values for your application. I paid between...I think 65-75 for each attenuator but he custom made them, used top notch components, did very professional work. If I was interested in price, I could have done this easily...and I think so could everyone here with a little soldering skill. Transformers work...but I thought only attenuation was needed not isolation. Depending on the amp you feed...maybe this has merit. But resistors are the cheapest route.

  8. #28
    Senior Hostboard Member Panomaniac's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 25th, 2006
    Posts
    1,811
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    1 Post(s)

    Re: Behringer DCX2496 Ultradrive Pro

    Yeah, I like Steve's idea. Use pots to find were you need to be then replace them wit fixed resistors.

    So you think the Sonys don't have any gain in the preamp circuit, yeah? Could be. Some of my vintage Pioneer and Sansui gear was like that, the pre outputs were really just after the selection switch. Volume, gain and tone were downstream. Too bad.

    You kinda-sorta need a preamp to drive this rig. It would have input selection, gain, volume and any other gadgets. The output of that would go to the DCX. Or am I misunderstanding you signal flow?

  9. #29
    Senior Hostboard Member Panomaniac's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 25th, 2006
    Posts
    1,811
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    1 Post(s)

    Re: Behringer DCX2496 Ultradrive Pro

    OK Marshall, I went back and reread you posts in this thread.

    Steve Summed it all up beautifully in post #11. Here is a good quote.
    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Mac View Post
    Two important steps to succeed with a digital crossover like the dcx.
    1) pump maximum signal into the crossover to ensure the signal is converted
    to attain maximum resolution
    2) attenuate the output signals from the behringer feeding the power amps.

    What I'm not sure about is this:
    Quote Originally Posted by mah View Post
    Amp 1 - 'Pre-amp out' (1Volt) which would be the drive to the crossover.
    OK, is the pre-amp out actually volume controlled on this amp? Have you checked? If it is, it probably also has gain, maybe 10dB, That's good and will help you with Steve's point #1. If the preamp outs are not variable, you'll need a preamp that has that.

    Steve's point #2 will be taken care of with your other amps because they have a volume control. So you can run a hot signal thru the DCX and turn it down at the amp. That's ideal.

  10. #30
    Senior Hostboard Member mah's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 28th, 2008
    Posts
    2,003
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    1 Post(s)

    Re: Behringer DCX2496 Ultradrive Pro

    Click on this link then click the TA 4650 download link for the service manual. Pages 2,3 & 4 have the specs and cicuit block-diagram. There is only one volume control and it is in the pre-amp section.

    I think it is worthwhile to proceed with purchasing one of the crossovers to place directly in the pre-main loop.
    If it is noisy I can boost the input to the crossover with a matching-amplifier or matching-transformer and then attenuate the crossover output passively. Am I correct?

    Marshall.
    Opinion is only as valid as its verifiable supporting evidence.

Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
This forum has been viewed: 28009079 times.